The last post on this blog proved nothing.
Not as bad as it sounds because the intention wasn't to prove anything, the intention was to find out what's possible. To ask if there might be a better way to answer this career question: "Where do you want to be in 5 years time?"
Proving and disproving should start with questions worth investigating. Questions that offer knowledge worth gaining. Questions that are worthwhile exploring.
It might seem like an unusual way to try and answer career questions but a mathematical approach does offer certainty. And if I'm not mistaken, mathematical certainties often begin with doubt too.
Maths has this much in common with career decision-making at least!
A worthy exploration or a waste of time?
Your opinion has the same value as anyone else's.
Maybe maths isn't the right discipline to help us as individuals answer this question. If that is ultimately proven (here or elsewhere) then we've all learned something worthwhile.
You don't have to be a maths professor for your opinion to count.
As an outsider to the language of maths, there are some things I am envious of. The importance of what you say, not who you are is one. Pierre de Fermat was a career lawyer not a mathematician after all.
Here's an excerpt from an email I received last week:
There are only two types of question:
1) Questions mathematics has answered
2) Questions mathematics has yet to answer
I took that as encouragement to keep exploring this question.
Special thanks to Steve and Kyle for commenting last week and moving this question forward.
All the best for now,